Quote:
Originally Posted by davilas
That's just one example of Jim's pretzel logic. He does that a lot, just bending reality so that it meets what he wants to believe. I hate bringing up anything about Taylor in this context but I remember him defending Love Story's misuse of the phrase scarlet letter and the way he bent over backwards to make his interpretation work was so nonsensical it was hilarious. He was trying to say that "scarlet letter" means something COMPLETELY different than what Nathaniel Hawthorne said.
|
Oh I remember that! I also remember in that same review that his Love Story review apparently started with a "thumbs down", but because Taylor has potential, and she used symbolism that is apparently rarely used in country songs today, the he decided the good outweighed the bad so he ended up giving the song a "thumbs up". Even though a few comments before that he acknowledged that Taylor's use of symbolism failed to really execute what she was meaning to say.
That's like a teacher giving a student an A just for effort, even though the end result of that work is so completely wrong. Or someone who paid a guy to do some work for him - the work was completely half-a$$ed but just because he worked, the guy got paid anyway.
Read more of Jim Malec's past work and his personal bias against Carrie cannot be denied. It's not because he thinks Carrie's material is not up to par to her talents (just like what the past editor Matt C used to write there and what Jeff mentioned above), but he just plainly dislikes her. He wrote a column 2 years ago explaining why Miranda Lambert is overrated:
The Malec Minute: Why Miranda Lambert is Overrated | The 9513
He referred to himself as a voice of reason.

And in pointing out Miranda's faults or shortcomings, he puts in snide remarks against Carrie in there. Which to me, is totally unnecessary and unwarranted. But he did anyway, and nothing proved his agenda against Carrie more than that.