Originally Posted by cyberzoney

We all have our opinions but I think overexposed is an overused term. It always comes up when people think that something is amiss. There are always examples of people who have had enough of a particular performer but in reality, they are often in the minority. Exposure is good for stars. The avid fans are the ones who can get overexposed as they go looking for everything available on the performer. The casual fan only see bits and pieces.

You can never be overexposed to good music. Look at Chesney, Rascal Flats, and all the other big names. They have songs on the charts constantly and it has been that way for years.

When you are not exposed, you run the risk of people saying that you are fading and losing appeal. That is worse than being overexposed.

About the only exposure that Carrie is getting right now is her concerts, award shows, and magazine covers. Concerts amount to little exposure as the audience is small and is mostly her avid fans. Concerts are her biggest focus right now. All the stars are at all the award shows and the best always perform. It's expected. When the time comes that she does not perform, then start worrying.

As far as I'm concerned, Carrie's promotion team should go for all the exposure they can get.

My only suggestion would be to swap some of the time spent on magazine covers into time spent singing in front of large groups of people, not just concerts.